RelaxNG support on nALFS?
jwrober at linuxfromscratch.org
Tue Nov 30 19:54:20 PST 2004
Jamie Bennett wrote:
> Should we introduce RelaxNG support into nALFS?
> Currently there is no DTD validation in nALFS and only well formedness is
> checked. Bug 617 (http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617)
> needs some sort of validation built into nALFS so should we go whole hog
> and add RelaxNG or make bug 617 a WONTFIX and make note of it for nALFS2?
> -- Jamie
What about SAX? We have enh reqs for both in bz and discussion points
on the wiki.
More information about the alfs-discuss