RelaxNG support on nALFS?

James Robertson jwrober at
Tue Nov 30 19:54:20 PST 2004

Jamie Bennett wrote:
> Should we introduce RelaxNG support into nALFS? 
> Currently there is no DTD validation in nALFS and only well formedness is
> checked. Bug 617 (
> needs some sort of validation built into nALFS so should we go whole hog 
> and add RelaxNG or make bug 617 a WONTFIX and make note of it for nALFS2?
> 	--	Jamie
What about SAX?  We have enh reqs for both in bz and discussion points 
on the wiki.


More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list