RelaxNG support on nALFS?

James Robertson jwrober at
Tue Nov 30 12:44:09 PST 2004

Matthew Burgess wrote:

> Well, depends on your definition of "easy" I suppose :)  Bear in mind 
> that (I think) we'd like a syntax that those not proficient with the 
> various XML-related specs/technologies can easily adapt for their own 
> uses.  Sure, given enough example profiles, customising xpointer syntax 
> may be entirely suitable.  I was thinking of something like a top-level 
> <alfsCollection> tag or something, that would then allow one or more 
> <alfs> children underneath it.  Like your change, it would only require 
> a change to the top-level LFS.xml profile.

That would be a DTD change?  Is there a way to get nALFS to rad the 
profile in and "figure out" what method was used to then allow validation?


More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list