RelaxNG support on nALFS?
jwrober at linuxfromscratch.org
Tue Nov 30 12:44:09 PST 2004
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Well, depends on your definition of "easy" I suppose :) Bear in mind
> that (I think) we'd like a syntax that those not proficient with the
> various XML-related specs/technologies can easily adapt for their own
> uses. Sure, given enough example profiles, customising xpointer syntax
> may be entirely suitable. I was thinking of something like a top-level
> <alfsCollection> tag or something, that would then allow one or more
> <alfs> children underneath it. Like your change, it would only require
> a change to the top-level LFS.xml profile.
That would be a DTD change? Is there a way to get nALFS to rad the
profile in and "figure out" what method was used to then allow validation?
More information about the alfs-discuss