RelaxNG support on nALFS?
matthew at linuxfromscratch.org
Tue Nov 30 10:26:02 PST 2004
Jamie Bennett wrote:
> Should we introduce RelaxNG support into nALFS?
> Currently there is no DTD validation in nALFS and only well formedness is
As is evidenced by the fact that as a result of XIncluding all the
separate XML documents that form the actual profile, you end up with
multpile <alfs> tags. An XML document should only ever have 1 root
element, so at the moment it'll only ever pass the well-formedness
checks. Changing/enforcing this validity isn't possible without
overhauling the profiles, and probably nALFS itself.
Bug 617 (http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617)
> needs some sort of validation built into nALFS so should we go whole hog
> and add RelaxNG or make bug 617 a WONTFIX and make note of it for nALFS2?
Certainly a WONTFIX for this version. RELAX NG would be my favoured
schema language, FWIW.
More information about the alfs-discuss