RelaxNG support on nALFS?
jamie_bennett at pcpmicro.co.uk
Tue Nov 30 05:37:56 PST 2004
Jeremy Huntwork wrote on 30 November 2004 13:23
> Jamie Bennett wrote:
>> Should we introduce RelaxNG support into nALFS?
>> Currently there is no DTD validation in nALFS and only well formedness is
>> checked. Bug 617 (http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617)
>> needs some sort of validation built into nALFS so should we go whole hog
>> and add RelaxNG or make bug 617 a WONTFIX and make note of it for nALFS2?
>> -- Jamie
> That sounds like it would be a major operation. Don't you think it might
> be a bit much for a tool we're sending to maintenance mode?
Thats what I thought.
> Jeremy Huntwork
More information about the alfs-discuss