RelaxNG support on nALFS?
jhuntwork at linuxfromscratch.org
Tue Nov 30 05:22:40 PST 2004
Jamie Bennett wrote:
>Should we introduce RelaxNG support into nALFS?
>Currently there is no DTD validation in nALFS and only well formedness is
>checked. Bug 617 (http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617)
>needs some sort of validation built into nALFS so should we go whole hog
>and add RelaxNG or make bug 617 a WONTFIX and make note of it for nALFS2?
> -- Jamie
That sounds like it would be a major operation. Don't you think it might
be a bit much for a tool we're sending to maintenance mode?
More information about the alfs-discuss