New Features for Profiles

Hui Zhou zhouhui at
Fri Nov 26 11:51:58 PST 2004

On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 09:11:57AM -0700, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>Jamie Bennett wrote:
>>Implementation wise it would just execute the (download) tags and any
>>(reference) tags inside of (unpack).
>Good luck with that. I've been down that road (mentally) before, and it 
>is fraught with complications... here are a few off the top of my head:
>- what if the download element is inside a stage element with a base 
>specified? have to execute the stage element too
>- what the stage element to be executed include a user-change to a user 
>that hasn't been created yet? or a chroot to a directory that hasn't 
>been created yet?
>- if you don't change to the user that the stage requests (if it does 
>already exist), then downloading as root may leave the files 
>inaccessible to the user who really wants them while the profile runs
>- what if the download element is going to download into a directory 
>that will be created by the profile itself?
>See what I mean? Many complications. You could certainly come up with 
>some combination of things that may work for the "official" LFS profile, 
>but then nALFS would become an "LFS profile tool", not a generic ALFS 
>profile tool (I know, that's a fine distinction, but it's still there).

I have  been down the road (not with nALFS, but with a perl tool that 
I have been worked on). For sure it is not a job within a teabreak, 
but it should be manageable within a evening or a weekend assuming the 
familiarity with the code base.

The way I did it is a --dry-run option which runs over all the 
elememts without actually exec any real command except the download 
command. Each handler will be passed with the dryrun option or 
replaced with a dry run handler which does nothing for most elements; 
For stage, chuser, or chroot, it tracks the default directory or user 
inorder to download the package into the correct directory that the 
user would desire. I wouldn't deny it is complicate to implement, but 
by using seperate handlers, it appears quite clean.

Hui Zhou

More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list