nALFS libxml2 version requirement (was nALFS 1.2.3 won't compile..)

James Robertson jwrober at
Wed Jun 9 14:59:10 PDT 2004

Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> James Robertson wrote:
>> OK.  That sounds like a good idea.  I should have the syntax doc 
>> finished by end of the week.  I would like to finish off the hackers 
>> guide before 1.2.4 is rolled if possible.  It is not that much content 
>> like the UG and SD.  Probably by end of next week.  Is that acceptable 
>> or is that too long?
> Hmm, I think that's too long for 1.2.4. I'd really like to reduce the 
> number of users who download 1.2.3 and try to use it on a system without 
> recent libxml2 support... but we've only gotten one problem report so 
> far, so maybe it's not that going to be a big problem. If we start 
> getting more problem reports then I'll accelerate 1.2.4 to get them 
> taken care of; if not, it can wait 7-8 days.
> As far as "finish off the hacker's guide", that's a big project :-)

Ok, then let's roll 1.2.4 with a fresh SD only and then if the need 
arises a 1.2.5 or something later.  I see your point on the limiting 
downloads of 1.2.3


James Robertson -- jwrober at linuxfromscratch dot org
Reg. Linux User -- #160424 --
Reg. LFS User   -- #6981   --
LFS Bugzilla Maintainer    -- http://{blfs-}

More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list