ALFS DTD Syntax Doc v3.1

James Robertson jwrober at
Sat Jun 5 21:02:38 PDT 2004

Kevin P. Fleming wrote:

> James Robertson wrote:
>> * Grammar
> Here's a grammatical nit that I'd like to get others' opinions on... 
> it's a big change if we decide it should be changed :-(
> Throughout the book there are constructs like this:
> "The attribute _base_"
> "The packages _gcc_ and _glibc_"
> "The element _param_"
> I find this to be hard to read, as it's not common English grammar. Even 
> with the font change for the referenced names (which is somewhat 
> subtle), it still does not seem to make sense.
> I'm not asking for a massive change at this point unless others feel 
> that it's warranted, but I'd like to see it happen if it could be done 
> in a reasonable period of time.

I was trying to "remind" the reader of the various thing they are 
reading about.  I hate it too, but this is technical document after all. 
  I can change the stylesheet and use a different token in the xml to 
make these stand out different?  Thoughts on that?  I do not mind 
changing this stuff, I will just need help on what we want it to say.


James Robertson -- jwrober at linuxfromscratch dot org
Reg. Linux User -- #160424 --
Reg. LFS User   -- #6981   --
LFS Bugzilla Maintainer    -- http://{blfs-}

More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list