RFC: Syntax Book
Kevin P. Fleming
kpfleming at linuxfromscratch.org
Sat Jan 31 08:06:22 PST 2004
James Robertson wrote:
> I don't think we should put implementation specific information into the
> syntax book. It is supposed to be implementation agnostic. We can put
> in the users guide and/or hackers guide any DTD implementation
> notes/issues about how nALFS handles things.
Agreed, the syntax doc should be implementation-agnostic. For that
matter so should the DTD, although at the moment changes to the DTD are
being driven by nALFS development.
More information about the alfs-discuss