RFC: Syntax Book

Kevin P. Fleming kpfleming at linuxfromscratch.org
Sat Jan 31 08:06:22 PST 2004


James Robertson wrote:

> I don't think we should put implementation specific information into the 
> syntax book.  It is supposed to be implementation agnostic.  We can put 
> in the users guide and/or hackers guide any DTD implementation 
> notes/issues about how nALFS handles things.

Agreed, the syntax doc should be implementation-agnostic. For that 
matter so should the DTD, although at the moment changes to the DTD are 
being driven by nALFS development.




More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list