<remove> DTD proposal
Kevin P. Fleming
kpfleming at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon Jan 26 18:23:42 PST 2004
Jamie Bennett wrote:
Actually base is an attribute here, so the proper way of doing this
I can't think of a way of doing it without breaking backwards
compatibility; that has already been broken for DTD version 3.2 in the
<patch> element, so if we're going to do it we might as well do all of
them we can think of at once to minimize future pain. Actually,
<remove>'s syntax was already incompatibly changed between 2.0 and 3.0,
so this is not a terribly big deal.
As best I can tell, <remove> is the only top-level element remaining
that used untagged content, so this would be a good thing to fix IMHO.
More information about the alfs-discuss