Glibc-2.3.3 tarball

Kevin P. Fleming kpfleming at
Wed Jan 14 12:26:14 PST 2004

James Robertson wrote:

> The patch is designed to fix a known issue.  If the book is keeping is 
> optional, then we need a way to make it optional as well.  What do we do 
> in the other options scenarios?  Kevin's original idea sounds fine to me 
> if that is how we are chosing to handle such things.

Well, we don't know yet that it will be optional in the book. I suspect 
it won't be, but if it is, then certainly we can make the profile be 
able to handle the non-patched case without too much effort.

More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list