Minor modification of profiles
jamie_bennett at pcpmicro.co.uk
Wed Feb 4 06:09:22 PST 2004
Sébastien wrote on 04 February 2004 14:41
> First I'd like to thank you for the hard work on both nALFS and the
> profiles, I think that having official profiles really improves (at
> least my) ability in testing.
> I've just tested the 5.1-pre1 everything is fine.
> However, I'm working on a powerpc and I need to change the linker name
> to ld.so.1 . I wonder if it could be made an entity defined in
> general.ent rather than being hardcoded in both ch05/ch06
> Since LFS is really portable (at least on powerpc), it seems logical to
> define the dynamic linker's name in just one place, am I wrong?
I personally can't see a problem with that but I'll wait to see what other
people think. The more arch's we can easily support the better IMHO.
Jamie Bennett - jamie at linuxfromscratch dot org
More information about the alfs-discuss