RelaxNG support on nALFS?

Jamie Bennett jamie at linuxuk.org
Wed Dec 1 11:57:45 PST 2004


On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 21:54 -0600, James Robertson wrote:
> Jamie Bennett wrote:
> > Should we introduce RelaxNG support into nALFS? 
> > 
> > Currently there is no DTD validation in nALFS and only well formedness is
> > checked. Bug 617 (http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617)
> > needs some sort of validation built into nALFS so should we go whole hog 
> > and add RelaxNG or make bug 617 a WONTFIX and make note of it for nALFS2?
> > 	  	
> > 	--	Jamie
> What about SAX?  We have enh reqs for both in bz and discussion points 
> on the wiki.

SAX is a parsing method not a validation one.

> James

	--	Jamie




More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list