RelaxNG support on nALFS?
jamie at linuxuk.org
Wed Dec 1 11:57:45 PST 2004
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 21:54 -0600, James Robertson wrote:
> Jamie Bennett wrote:
> > Should we introduce RelaxNG support into nALFS?
> > Currently there is no DTD validation in nALFS and only well formedness is
> > checked. Bug 617 (http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617)
> > needs some sort of validation built into nALFS so should we go whole hog
> > and add RelaxNG or make bug 617 a WONTFIX and make note of it for nALFS2?
> > -- Jamie
> What about SAX? We have enh reqs for both in bz and discussion points
> on the wiki.
SAX is a parsing method not a validation one.
More information about the alfs-discuss