[RFC] "Working plan" for BitKeeper usage for the ALFS team (long)
thomasp at linuxfromscratch.org
Fri Apr 16 13:15:20 PDT 2004
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 14:43, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Thomas Pegg wrote:
> > Ok, I do see it now. But what about the license, according to
> > documentation, it says it requires a commercial license, or is it
> > possible another way?
> The web site is not current; the documentation with BK says:
> 1) a commercial license
> 2) an Internet-connected host (not behind a NAT firewall) that allows
> clone/pull operations (which is the normal read-only mode)
Hmmm, maybe that's why I can't get it working on my system, because I am
behind a NAT firewall, but then I haven't opened the port either.
> So the free version works for this application just fine.
More information about the alfs-discuss