[RFC] "Working plan" for BitKeeper usage for the ALFS team (long)
Kevin P. Fleming
kpfleming at linuxfromscratch.org
Fri Apr 16 12:43:35 PDT 2004
Thomas Pegg wrote:
> Ok, I do see it now. But what about the license, according to
> documentation, it says it requires a commercial license, or is it
> possible another way?
The web site is not current; the documentation with BK says:
1) a commercial license
2) an Internet-connected host (not behind a NAT firewall) that allows
clone/pull operations (which is the normal read-only mode)
So the free version works for this application just fine.
More information about the alfs-discuss