[VOTE] Re: directory-handling with nALFS
jwrober at linuxfromscratch.org
Fri Apr 2 11:44:06 PST 2004
> On Friday 02 April 2004 16:59, James Robertson wrote:
>>>On Friday 02 April 2004 01:02, James Robertson wrote:
>>>>+1 for leave it alone. I like the error and can easily use the parents
>>>could you please explain me the benefit of the error?
>>Mostly for logging purposes. I want to know either way. I don't see
>>the need to suppress any informational message.
> 8-D that's quite a different issue!
> I very like logging too, but that's no reason to raise an error.
> In case that the directory has already been created (by a former run)
> it's easy to add a log-message telling you about the situation.
> So you have your log-entry and the process needs not to fail/stop.
> Could that be a compromise?
Yes, that would be fine and as you mentioned, make it an option in the
More information about the alfs-discuss