[VOTE] Re: directory-handling with nALFS
bookreader at gmx.com
Fri Apr 2 10:08:27 PST 2004
On Friday 02 April 2004 16:59, James Robertson wrote:
> Reinhard wrote:
> > On Friday 02 April 2004 01:02, James Robertson wrote:
> >>+1 for leave it alone. I like the error and can easily use the parents
> > Hello James,
> > could you please explain me the benefit of the error?
> Mostly for logging purposes. I want to know either way. I don't see
> the need to suppress any informational message.
8-D that's quite a different issue!
I very like logging too, but that's no reason to raise an error.
In case that the directory has already been created (by a former run)
it's easy to add a log-message telling you about the situation.
So you have your log-entry and the process needs not to fail/stop.
Could that be a compromise?
> Put all your requests into Bugzilla as enhancement requests at
> http://bugs.linuxfromscratch.org. You will need to create an account
> first if you have not done so already. Anyone can enter a bug. That
> way we can vote there if we need to, or at least have a good reference
> for discussion.
Thanks, I'll check it out.
More information about the alfs-discuss