dtd help

Kevin P. Fleming kpfleming at linuxfromscratch.org
Tue Nov 4 10:03:28 PST 2003


Jamie Bennett wrote:

> Kevin P. Fleming wrote on 04 November 2003 17:50
> 
>>No, <url> is not required for <download>. Without it, all <download> 
>>will do is check to ensure that the file is present, and that the digest 
>>matches if <digest> was supplied. Not really what you'd intend to use 
>><download> for, but it will work that way.
> 
> 
> Mmm, the naming of the <download> tag is a bit confusing in this case then.

I wouldn't be opposed to changing the DTD, but that will have to wait 
for syntax version 3.2 (can't make an incompatible change in 3.1), which 
we will open up after nALFS 1.2.0 is released. I'd suggest entering a 
bugzilla entry for this one, Jamie, against the DTD.




More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list