nALFS Patch - nALFS-1.1.8-rootfix.patch (0/1)

David Wheeler davewheeler69 at
Sun Nov 2 12:46:31 PST 2003

On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 13:34:03 -0700, "Kevin P. Fleming"
<kpfleming at> wrote:

>That's a darn good point David; that means either the "syntax doc" is 
>incorrect or nALFS is incorrect. I wasn't around when the ALFS syntax 
>was created so I can't venture a guess, but I'd say at this point that 
>the syntax doc will likely have to be changed to match nALFS rather than 
>the other way around.

Sounds good - although I wouldn't complain if you wanted to make it an
option in the end!  :)  
I'd take a crack myself, but I don't know the code well enough yet.

More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list