ALFS DTD documentation
haski at sezampro.yu
Sun Jan 19 08:02:02 PST 2003
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 03:38:49PM +0100, Vassili Dzuba wrote:
> Following the discussion we had a few days ago
> on this list, under the title "adding <utilizes> to the DTD",
> i updated the DTD and the documentation to take the modifications
> discussed into account.
> As these modifications are not compatible, i named the version "3.1".
> - write a patch to nALFS to support version 3.1, unless
> Neven prefers do it himself (what do you think, Neven ?)
If you have time, I wouldn't mind you doing that of course. :)
But if not, I'll do it myself eventually (before the next release for
> Any comment is welcome...
In the future, I think we'll need to add a version for <requires> and
<utilizes> elements - minimum version that some package requires, and
stuff like that. So maybe we should use:
right from the start, so we wouldn't have to break the syntax again?
Also, I still believe that:
<p> instead of <para>,
<ul> instead of <list> and
<li> instead of <item>
would be much more useful, so one can just dump the whole
<description>'s content as HTML. But that's minor, and I'm perfectly
OK with current names.
BTW, check out the examples for <packageinfo> (and those elements
inside it) in the XML document for 3.1.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe alfs-discuss' in the subject header of the message
More information about the alfs-discuss