nALFS, CVS and BugZilla

Bill's LFS Login lfsbill at wlmcs.com
Fri Aug 15 12:43:17 PDT 2003


On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Gerard Beekmans wrote:

> On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 12:05, James Robertson wrote:
> > Can we get nALFS added to CVS and a project added to bugzilla for it?
> > It looks like if the testing team goes forward with it, we will need to
> > have this available for updates.
>
> Yes, I can do all that, but not until Neven agrees to it.
>
> Neven, are you aware of the discussions taking place on the lfs-ev list
> regarding the re-organization of the LFS project?
>
> The parts that matter to ALFS is that there will be a testing team that
> will be in charge of doing all that required testing before features are
> added to the book (LFS and BLFS). Some test framework needs to be setup
> and there is the possiblity that they decide on using nALFS or some
> similar program. The testing team would probably want to continue
> development of nALFS and have featured added as they need it. I'm not
> sure what your plans and ideas are for nALFS.

Are you guys "jumping the gun" here? Or just trying to increase the
chaos before the new management tools can reduce it? ;)

We don't want give the impression that all the discussions are just
"window dressing".

-- 
Bill Maltby
lfsbill at wlmcs.com



More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list