Revised chroot command in lfs-cvs

Gerard Beekmans gerard at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon Apr 28 10:00:56 PDT 2003


On April 27, 2003 12:56 pm, Neven Has wrote:
> Right, but I would agree it's ugly to rely on PATH this much, so that
> <shell> (or whatever we name it) that you suggest does look like a
> nice solution.

I think <shell> is good enough of a name. Without that tag, nALFS won't run in 
a shell but just use a chroot(2) systemcall right? So adding a <shell> tag 
does exactlly that: it'll run in an actual sub-shell now instead of a 
systemcall.

-- 
Gerard Beekmans
www.linuxfromscratch.org

-*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe alfs-discuss' in the subject header of the message



More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list