nALFS feature request
haski at sezampro.yu
Wed May 15 12:29:44 PDT 2002
On Sun, Jan 12, 1997 at 04:36:52PM +0100, Raphael Schmid wrote:
> Hmm. Maybe I should automate the feature requesting thing :-)
> I've just noticed that you cannot do:
> If the fact that this is not working is not considered a feature,
> it might be worth a thought...
It's an interesting idea. So:
could be equivalent to:
first a && second b
There is very little difference between this and multiple <execute>s,
so it might not be worth it? And it's a bit confusing?
> Another question, regarding <remove> this time,
This was mentioned in the past. Search for one of the older mails
about it ("remove" AND "base" AND "error" or something).
In short, I think there is less chance for screwing things up without
those. But that's just IMHO.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe alfs-discuss' in the subject header of the message
More information about the alfs-discuss