Syntax, shall we?
al593181 at mail.mty.itesm.mx
Fri Jan 25 10:12:43 PST 2002
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:47:46AM -0800, Jesse Tie-Ten-Quee wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 10:40:35PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > It whould be simpler if we can say... everything inside options tags is
> > going to be prefixed with --<option> and passed to the shell, tat way we
> > can forget about <system_command> and and doesn't need to account every
> > option.
> I think you are missing the point a little...
> Let's take the <link> and <remove> tags under consideration, using the C
> programming language. All the functuality that the command line tools
> provide are available from system calls, heck those clt's use the system
> calls. What would stop me from implementing either of those tags using
> those system calls instead of from clt's? That's the kind of
> portability that matters, imho. Any other way and it really is just a
> huge wrapper/shell script if you ask me.
Yes I know, look at the next line I wrote:
Unfortunately we are hidding from the shell. <-- Didn't you saw it?
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe alfs-discuss' in the subject header of the message
More information about the alfs-discuss