haski at sezampro.yu
Wed Feb 27 10:48:56 PST 2002
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 04:54:13PM +0000, Pedro Ortigão wrote:
> I'm not sure I'll be albe to reproduce that behaviour. It has happenned a
> couple of times. What happens is that somewhere alogin the way the running
> status mark ('>') is updated any longer, ie, keeps pointing to the same
> part of the profile, even though it is already executing the next parts. In
> the end you get some parts of the profile marked has completed ('#') and
> some like they haven't been marked to run... and the parent "process"
> marked has ('@'). In any case all the profile was correctly built.
> Hope this helps. I'll try to reproduce the behaviour. Maybe the profile is
> too long, it follows the same design of your LFS3.1 the parent XML is goes
> like this:
I don't know how the size of the profile can make a difference,
but who knows, it might.
It'll be tricky to find a problem if it can't be reproduced (and I have
built _a_lot_ of different profiles without noticing something like this),
but I'll look into it.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe alfs-discuss' in the subject header of the message
More information about the alfs-discuss