Syntax, shall we?
mark.uzumati at virgin.net
Sun Feb 3 04:38:49 PST 2002
On 2002.02.01 18:06 Neven Has wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:39:24PM +0100, Fabio Fracassi wrote:
> > > > I would still rename <meta> in something more descriptive, but I
> > > > think of a better name - <info> or something... or not. :)
> > >
> > > That's actually not a bad idea. I just used meta..as well didn't
> > > anything better, <info> it is, or does anyone else have a better
> > > keyword?
> > How about
> > <Description>
> I was thinking that we could use that inside <info> to describe what
> the package is/does.
Sounds good to me.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe alfs-discuss' in the subject header of the message
More information about the alfs-discuss