mark.uzumati at virgin.net
Mon Dec 2 05:34:21 PST 2002
On 2002.11.30 12:58 Neven Has wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 08:48:12AM -0000, Jamie Bennett wrote:
> > > In syntax version 2.0, you were able to use <setenv>. It was
> > > removed, and it's not part of 3.0. But you can apply the attached
> > > patch to nALFS, and then use that element with 3.0 too.
> > Is there a reason why it was removed? Are we likely to see it back
> > in the next nALFS version?
> Well, it's already there, and it can be easily enabled for 3.0 too
> (as you saw from that patch). But should it be returned in it by
> default, I don't know. It's one of those things for discussing. ;)
> It's easier to use than <stageinfo>/<packageinfo>, but these are more
> "structured", in a way.
No reason it shouldnt be in by default, just with a really big note
pointing out the possible problems :)
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe alfs-discuss' in the subject header of the message
More information about the alfs-discuss