mark.uzumati at virgin.net
Mon Apr 1 14:19:43 PST 2002
On 2002.04.01 23:13 Jesse Tie-Ten-Quee wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:06:37PM +0100, Mark Ellis wrote:
> > I see what you mean, but i still like the idea. Maybe it would
> > readability to have the stage name as an attribute, it would then be
> > more obviously attached to that particular stage ? Still keep all
> > other stuff in <stageinfo>. Or maybe it just shouldn't be a
> > for the *build stuff, but instead used specifically for modifying
> > environment, and i use environment in its broad term, including user
> > and group as well as variables ?
> What if we used.. Like Lee, you and myself have tried to suggest the
> name as an attributed, So that we have like;
> <stage name="build">
> And for things like, su/user/group/env, just add in elements, like;
> <stage name="setup">
> And it gets unset when it exit's out of this stage? I duno, just an
> idea that popped into my head.
I think there may still be a place for <stageinfo> when setting the
environment etc. just to group all the settings together, just IMHO.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe alfs-discuss' in the subject header of the message
More information about the alfs-discuss