Jesse Tie Ten Quee
highos at highos.com
Tue Jun 12 20:58:45 PDT 2001
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:32:09PM -0700, Andy wrote:
> What could be an idea is to use a modular fe/be system. This is slightly
> further fetched than the ideas flying around right now.
Well...we wanted to keep that idea in the long run.
> We could add another layer to the backend, which provides the facility to
> grab the packages from a multitude of locations. For instance, for deploying
> on a network multiple times, grab the profile and packages from a HTTP
> server, with a be module that supports this. Another module could be written
> to grab things from CVS, another from a CD. This would provide a great deal
> of flexibility for deploying ALFS.
yup, also what we wanted in the long run... and like i said, i agree
that right now writting some design docs would be the best thing as
there are too many unanswered questions which need answering if we
expect anyone to help out.
> The same idea could be used for the frontend, where the IPC interface with
> the backend is language neutral. You could write a silent frontent, a nice
> graphical one using a X server, one that is silent except it reports back
> the result to an admin via email, etc. If we design it properly (and that
> means creating a design doc, sorry to push this idea so much :), then we can
> avoid a great deal of hastle (and limitations) in the future.
Jesse Tie Ten Quee - highos at highos dot com
Unsubscribe: send email to alfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message
More information about the alfs-discuss