Updated syntax.txt (was: looking for syntax wor...)
haski at sezampro.yu
Fri Jan 12 06:33:16 PST 2001
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 01:56:09AM +0000, Bryan Dumm wrote:
> > 1. Is it really necessary to have both tag and notag scenerious in
> > ALFS? Seems a bit confusing and not consistent in a few places. Seems
> > like either one or the other makes more sense depending on which tag.
> So far umm yes, unless people want to kill the notag scenario....
This one does. :)
> Tag value: alternate configure command (!= "./configure")
> what does this mean?
I assume the configure command that is _not_ "./configure".
Like "../gcc-2.95.2/configure" for example. I agree it's a bit confusing.
> on the FIXME: NET YET IMPLEMENTED!
FIXME: NOT YET IMPLEMENTED!
FIXME: NOTE YET IMPLEMENTED!
FIXME: NET YET IMPLEMENTED!
And the answer is ... FIXME: NOT YET IMPLEMENTED! !!!
5 points :)
> what are we going to do with those elements????
I'm not sure if there is way other then system command?
We should implement it (MAKEDEV, yacc, makewhatis, files in /var,
scripts, etc. And not just for LFS profile.)
It's not really needed, but it can make things look prettier?
There are a few more typos (mainly in examples) but it's a good work in
general and will help us a lot.
More information about the alfs-discuss