gcc 2.95.2 crash during static compile..

Barry Barry at hartford.uconn.edu
Thu Nov 9 17:17:54 PST 2000


> > yeah, let's just say I'm not entirely positive that gcc 2.96 (3.0?) is
> > entirely stable enough to be placed into a major distro like Red Hat...
> 
> There never was an official GNU GCC release labeled 2.96, there was in
> the development/snapshot release..
> 
> This is just RH, getting worse and worse over time, what a shame, what a
> shame.

you're right...a major distro like that, like I said, shouldn't use CVS
software... I understand why they're doing it (getting people used to it
by "force") - but, isn't that a Microsoft tactic...

err, don't get me wrong, Red Hat isn't Microsoft by any means...but this
move is a bit too iffy...

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to alfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org
and put unsubscribe in the subject header of the message




More information about the alfs-discuss mailing list