Actual tool design
nomis80 at videotron.ca
Tue Jun 27 19:59:04 PDT 2000
Security... Nothing keeps somebody from writing a complicated script that
would do evil things. So if you want to talk about security, you have to
impose limits as to what profiles can or can't do. And even then there would
certainly be holes, and those holes would be enormous.
Maybe I didn't understand your point correctly.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerard Beekmans" <gerard at linuxfromscratch.org>
To: <alfs-discuss at linuxfromscratch.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: Actual tool design
> > Advantages over rpms:
> > 1) You get to compile the source yourself. You don't install
> > binaries, so you may enable optimization.
> > 2) You don't have to download a big tarball enabled for the tool. You
> > download the script if you want to use the tool with the tarball.
> 3) security. No more worries about somebody making a nasty rpm that
> does more than just installing something (although that doesn't happen
> all that often, it still is a security risc).
> Gerard Beekmans
> -*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
> Mail archive: http://www.pcrdallas.com/mail-archives/alfs-discuss
> IRC access: server: irc.linuxfromscratch.org port: 6667 channel: #LFS
> Unsubscribe: email alfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org and put
> "unsubscribe" (without the quotation marks) in the body of the message
> (no subject is required)
Mail archive: http://www.pcrdallas.com/mail-archives/alfs-discuss
IRC access: server: irc.linuxfromscratch.org port: 6667 channel: #LFS
Unsubscribe: email alfs-discuss-request at linuxfromscratch.org and put
"unsubscribe" (without the quotation marks) in the body of the message
(no subject is required)
More information about the alfs-discuss